You used to shop with us most weeks. What changed?
Lapsed Customer Research
Interviewer agent · 1.1K uses
Four theories, one leasing decision, and no evidence. This settles it. Counting people through the door tells you the trend and nothing about the cause. Meanwhile the leasing, marketing and operations teams each have a theory, and the capital plan gets built on whichever is argued best. This conversation goes to the visitors themselves and ranks the theories against their real behavior.
Start from this conversation and adapt it to your team — change any question, add your own logic, and connect the tools you already use.
The core fields every response captures.
Always establish the old visit pattern before asking what changed
Ask what would realistically bring the visits back
Follow-ups that change based on what people say.
If they moved away or changed jobs, mark it structural rather than a property problem
If they name a specific closure, ask whether anything else could replace that trip
Different paths for different answers.
Send tenant-driven findings to leasing before the next renewal cycle
Escalate safety or condition themes to property operations
Actions that fire the moment a response comes in.
Post theory-ranking results to #asset-management in Slack
Log the findings against the property record in HubSpot
Alert leasing when a departed anchor is repeatedly named as the cause
The conversation reaches people who used to visit more often and reconstructs what changed: how often they came, what the trip was for, when it tailed off, and where those trips go now. It probes whether the cause sits with the property, with the tenant mix, with their own circumstances, or with something external. Because it is repeatable, you can re-run it after an intervention to confirm the change actually landed.
Recruit past visitors through your own list, tenant lists, or a local panel
Write down your competing theories before you run it so the test is honest
Decide which findings would actually change the leasing or capital plan
Re-run the same conversation after the intervention to confirm movement
Static forms force complex situations into rigid dropdowns. Perspective captures structured data and the reasoning behind it — so your team makes better decisions, faster.
No context. No follow-up. No next step.
"Tell me more about the timeline — when did this start, and is there a deadline your team is working against?"
Extracted & structured automatically
Category
High-priority
Urgency
Deadline: 2 weeks
Sentiment
Frustrated but hopeful
Next step
Route to senior team
Right team. Full context. Instant action.
It is research with past and lapsed visitors to explain why footfall at a property has declined. It complements counter data, which establishes the shape and timing of the decline, by supplying the mechanism. For a property team facing a leasing or capital decision, the mechanism is the entire question, because the same decline curve can be produced by causes with completely different remedies.
More property templates for tenant mix, shopper safety and lapsed visitors.
You used to shop with us most weeks. What changed?
Interviewer agent · 1.1K uses
You use both shops. What decided this trip?
Interviewer agent · 1.6K uses
Did the rewards actually decide where you shopped that day?
Interviewer agent · 1.5K uses
What first made you look at anything else?
Interviewer agent · 968 uses
Where do you shop for this now?
Interviewer agent · 1K uses
Walk me through last week's shops.
Interviewer agent · 1.6K uses
How property teams turn traffic counts into a cause they can act on.

Why behavioral data shows the drop-off and never the decision behind it.
Read article
Nine retail CX platforms compared by how well each explains shopper behavior.
Read article
Where long forms lose people, and what a conversation recovers that a form cannot.
Read articleReplace drop-off, poor qualification, and missing context with AI conversations that capture structured data and real understanding. Set up in minutes.
No credit card required • Cancel anytime