Did you get what you came in for?
Branch Experience Survey
Evaluator agent · 1.1K uses
A fraud case is where a customer finds out whether the bank is on their side. Fraud and disputes are stressful, and the thing customers remember is not the outcome so much as whether they felt believed while it was being decided. This conversation is handled with care and asks about the experience, never re-opening the case itself.
Start from this conversation and adapt it to your team — change any question, add your own logic, and connect the tools you already use.
The core fields every response captures.
Always ask whether they felt believed, separately from the outcome
Ask how the experience left them feeling about the bank
Follow-ups that change based on what people say.
If the case was declined, handle it with extra care and focus on clarity of communication
If they felt disbelieved, ask what specifically gave them that impression
Different paths for different answers.
Send trust-damaged customers to retention whatever the case outcome
Escalate communication failures to the fraud operations team
Actions that fire the moment a response comes in.
Alert #fraud-ops in Slack when customers report feeling disbelieved
Update the customer record in Salesforce with post-dispute trust level
Create a retention task for any customer whose trust was damaged
The conversation is deliberately gentle, acknowledging that the topic is stressful. It asks how the bank responded when they first reported it, how long resolution took, how clearly they were kept informed, and whether they felt believed throughout. It stays firmly on the experience rather than the decision, and closes on how the whole thing left them feeling about the bank.
Trigger after the case is closed, whether upheld or declined
Brief the conversation to stay on experience and never re-adjudicate the case
Capture whether they felt believed as a distinct measure from the outcome
Route customers whose trust was damaged to retention regardless of the case outcome
Static forms force complex situations into rigid dropdowns. Perspective captures structured data and the reasoning behind it — so your team makes better decisions, faster.
No context. No follow-up. No next step.
"Tell me more about the timeline — when did this start, and is there a deadline your team is working against?"
Extracted & structured automatically
Category
High-priority
Urgency
Deadline: 2 weeks
Sentiment
Frustrated but hopeful
Next step
Route to senior team
Right team. Full context. Instant action.
It is feedback from customers after a fraud or transaction dispute is closed, focused on how the process felt rather than on the decision. It is run on both upheld and declined cases, because the experience of being disbelieved damages the relationship whether or not the money is returned.
More banking templates for call center, branch experience and switching.
Did you get what you came in for?
Evaluator agent · 1.1K uses
What was the last thing you tried to do in the app?
Evaluator agent · 1.5K uses
Is the issue actually resolved now?
Evaluator agent · 2.2K uses
Was anything harder than it should have been?
Evaluator agent · 2K uses
Where did it go slow?
Evaluator agent · 1.2K uses
Do you know what happens next?
Evaluator agent · 1K uses
How banks measure trust after a fraud case rather than just case closure.

How banks close the gap between a satisfaction score and a fixable cause.
Read article
How a challenger bank rebuilt onboarding around conversation instead of forms.
Read article
How a member-first fintech uses conversation to understand financial intent.
Read articleReplace drop-off, poor qualification, and missing context with AI conversations that capture structured data and real understanding. Set up in minutes.
No credit card required • Cancel anytime